|
|
|
|
Service Qualification Software Market Research
[Back to Birds-Eye.Net Market
Research]
By: Bruce Bahlmann - Contributing Author (your
feedback
is important to us!)
Update:
December 21, 2005
Created:
September 28, 2002Document:
According to Yankee
Group forecasts, broadband data service in the US is growing at that rate of about 5
million subscribers per year. Average churn among broadband data providers is about two
percent which results in an additional ~614k subscribers changing providers. As a result
there is an opportunity to sell 5.614 million units of service qualification software
within the US alone annually at least through the year 2007. The current
(2002) 19 million broadband users in the US represent roughly 6 percent of the US
population and the 5-year projection is that up to 17% of the US population will have
broadband subscriptions by the year 2007. If the US population represents 4% of the world population, the global annual
market for service qualification software is approximately 126 million units
assuming the penetration and adoption rates worldwide resemble that of the US. Of course
these assumptions are not the case so this figure is a best-case scenario.
Service qualification software vendors receive anywhere from $0.50 to
$1.50 per unit for their software. If we average this cost over all units sold the average
costs of service qualification software is probably around $1 US per unit or less. So the
worldwide market for service qualification software is around $126 million annually. How
this revenue is divided up among vendors depends on the number of operators each vendor
has sold to.
Company Info |
Founded |
Public/Private |
Relative Market Share |
Share of $126 million annually |
Employees |
Aramova
524A Union Street
San Francisco, CA 94133
Tel: 415.242.1984 |
1995 |
Private |
7 (?) of
9.2% |
~$11 million |
21 |
Friendly
Technologies
94-01 68th Ave.
Forest Hills, NY 11375
Tel: 866.447.8640 |
1997 |
Private |
17 (200+) of
22% |
~$28 million |
16 |
Fine Point
Technologies
90 John Street
New York, NY 10038
Tel: 212.962.7410 |
1997 |
Private |
4 (400) of
5.2% |
~$6 million |
20 |
Motive
12515 Research Blvd.
Building 5
Austin, Texas 78759
Tel: 512.339.8335 |
1997 |
Private |
25 (?) of
32% |
~$41 million |
230 |
NetSurfer
150 Interstate North Parkway
Suite 220
Atlanta, GA 30339
Tel: 770.956.7873 |
1994 |
Private |
1? (500) of
1% |
$1 million |
? |
SupportSoft
575 Broadway
Redwood City, California 94063
Tel: 650.556.9440 |
1994 |
Private |
22 (250) of
29% |
~$36 million |
? |
Table
1.0 Company and Associated Market Share Summary Information
In
Table 1.0, the relative market share represents an approximation of the number of
broadband service providers that have signed up with a particular service qualification
software vendor. The actual share of the $126 million received by each vendor is dependent
not only on the number of service providers each vendor signs up but also how many
subscribers each of those vendors support. Since this information is not really available
these numbers are only approximate. Note that a number of broadband service providers may
use multiple service qualification vendors so a vendor may not be able to claim all of the
broadband service provider subscriber numbers.
Invenstor, customer and product info:
| Company |
Investors |
Past/Present Customer Wins |
Product(s) |
|
Aramova |
? |
AT&T, Bell Canada, MindSpring, NTL (UK),
Telewest (UK), Verizon, XO Communications |
Gearbox |
| Friendly
Technologies |
Vectory Investment Company, Linktech and
Argoquest Inc.- and by its founders, Mr. Elan Migdal and Mr. Yuval Matron. |
Alvarion, Bezeq, Broadwing, Cingular, Excel,
Fidelity Networks, Flash Networks, IBM, IP Applications, NetVision, Redback Networks,
Startnet, Sprint, TisCali, US Lec, Wanado |
FriendlySI, FriendlyPPPoE, GoBroadband,
BroadbandReady |
| Fine Point
Technologies |
? |
Claims to have 400 some customers |
CyberTruck, ServPoET, WinPoET, TotalInternet |
|
Motive |
? |
Adelphia, Aliant Telecom, AT&T Broadband,
Bell Canada, Bell South, Charter Communications, NTL, RoadRunner, SBC Communications,
Sprint, TELMEX, TELUS, Time Warner Cable |
ControlWorks |
| NetSurfer |
? |
Nearly 500 internet access providers, sold
over 4 million licenses in 14 different countries |
NetKit |
|
SupportSoft |
? |
3M, Adelphia, ADP, Assurant
Solutions, Bank of America, Bell South, BT, Charter, Cisco, Comcast,
CompuCom, Cox, ibm, kpn, Procter&Gamble, Siebel, Sony |
Real-Time Service Management (RTSM),
Endpoint Automation Suite, Assisted Service Suite, Self-Service Suite |
Table 2.0 Investor, Customer, and Product Info
Interesting Links to Vendor White Papers:
ServiceWare -
White Papers
Technical feature comparison of service qualification companies:
The following is a list of possible service qualification features as
well as those that have been publically claimed (through websites, press releases, etc.)
by the vendors below. This analysis merely represents a survey of possible features
supported by different vendors - actual features that exist on shipping products by
these vendors may vary.
| Company/Features |
Aramova |
Friendly
Technologies |
Fine Point
Technologies |
Motive |
NetSurfer |
SupportSoft |
| Standard/Platform
Features (6 items) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Administration kit |
X |
O |
X |
O |
O |
X |
| Driver installation |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
| Software installation |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
| Software configuration |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
| Optional client software/hardware inventory |
X |
O |
X |
O |
X |
X |
| Update Engine (branding, config, etc.) |
X |
X |
X |
O |
O |
X |
| Broadband (34 items) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cable - HSD support |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
| Telco - DSL support |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
| Apple, unix, windows support |
Apple, windows |
Windows |
Apple, windows |
Apple, windows |
Windows/unix |
Apple, windows |
| Languages supported |
English, German, French,
Italian |
English |
English, Dutch, Korean,
Spanish, Japanese, Portuguese, and 8 others |
English |
English, Japanese,
Portuguese, Spanish |
English, German, French,
Italian |
| OSS component |
X - partner |
O |
X |
X |
X |
X - partner |
| Auto NIC & TCP/IP detection |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
| Bandwidth QoS measurements |
X |
X |
X |
O |
X |
X |
| Client |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CD client
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Download client
|
X |
X |
X |
O |
X |
X |
Regional CD client
|
X |
O |
O |
X |
X |
X |
| Dial-Roaming Support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optional auto LAN/dialup selection
|
O |
O |
O |
O |
X |
O |
Alternate for mobile users
|
X |
O |
O |
O |
X |
X |
Backup for outage
|
X |
O |
O |
O |
X |
X |
| Dynamic service selection |
O |
O |
X |
O |
O |
O |
| HTML dashboard (before, after install) |
X - both |
O |
O |
O |
O |
X - both |
| Integrated 3rd party software installation |
X |
O |
O |
X |
X |
X |
| Messaging to clients |
O |
O |
X |
O |
O |
O |
| Multiple ISP |
X |
X |
O |
X |
X |
X |
Conversions
|
X |
O |
O |
X |
O |
X |
| Optional forced login to network |
O |
O |
O |
O |
X |
O |
Detailed connection tracing
|
O |
X |
X |
O |
O |
O |
Pay-per-use application support
|
O |
X |
O |
O |
O |
O |
PPPoE client (multi-session)
|
X |
X |
X |
O |
O |
X |
PPPoE Server
|
O |
O |
X |
O |
O |
O |
PPTP client (single session)
|
O |
X |
O |
O |
O |
O |
Remote control & management
|
O |
X |
X |
O |
O |
O |
Sessioning application options
|
O |
X |
X |
O |
O |
O |
| Optional vendor specific modem detection and
diagnostic |
X |
O |
O |
O |
X |
X |
| Optional vendor specific NIC/driver
installation |
X |
O |
O |
O |
X |
X |
| Pre-install detection of min. requirements |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
| Post-install service checks |
X |
O |
X |
O |
O |
X |
| Portal direct |
O |
O |
X |
O |
O |
O |
| Residential gateway |
O |
X |
O |
X |
O |
O |
| Self-healing diagnostics |
X |
X |
X |
O |
O |
X |
| Self-installation |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
| Service initiation |
X |
X |
X |
X |
O |
X |
| Support automation (self-care) |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
| WatchDog |
O |
O |
X |
O |
O |
O |
| Dialup (10 items) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Apple, unix, windows support |
Apple, windows |
Apple, windows |
Apple, windows |
O |
windows/unix |
Apple, windows |
| Connectivity QoS measurements |
O |
X |
O |
O |
X |
O |
| Customizable dialers |
O |
X |
O |
O |
O |
O |
| Demographic information collector |
O |
O |
O |
O |
X |
O |
| Dynamic re-branding |
X |
O |
O |
O |
X |
X |
| Internet desktop application |
X |
X |
O |
O |
X |
X |
| Online registration |
X |
X |
X |
O |
X |
X |
| Pre-install detection of min. requirements |
X |
X |
X |
O |
X |
X |
| Support automation |
X |
X |
X |
O |
X |
X |
| Targeted content distribution |
X |
O |
O |
O |
X |
X |
| Wireless (4 items) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GPRS support |
O |
X |
? |
O |
O |
O |
| GSM support |
O |
X |
? |
O |
O |
O |
| HSCSD support |
O |
X |
? |
O |
O |
O |
| Support automation |
O |
X |
? |
O |
O |
O |
| Satellite (1 items) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ? |
O |
O |
? |
O |
O |
O |
| Results: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SCORE (out of 59 possible
categories) |
36 |
35 |
35 |
17.5 |
33.5 |
36 |
| Percentage of possible |
61.08% |
59.3% |
59.5% |
29.7% |
56.8% |
61.08% |
| RATING |
excellent |
excellent |
excellent |
poor |
excellent |
excellent |
Index:
X = Supported
O = Not Supported
? = Partially, not fully, or questionably supported
Technical feature discrepancies:
| Companies |
Aramova |
Motive |
Friendly Technologies |
Fine Point Technologies |
NetSurfer |
SupportSoft |
| Unique or
specialized capabilities |
HTML
content driven pre/post install. |
Unique
regional CD and residential gateway support. |
Unique
Quality of Service management capabilities for multiple services |
Unique
PPPoE client/server architecture |
Unix
support and optional forced login to network feature. |
Unix
support and optional forced login to network feature. |
| Strong points |
Remote
configuration, software, and branding management. Flexible integration with 3rd
parties. |
Understanding
of broadband space (especially cable where a majority of its customers come from). |
Supports
multiple clients over multiple service configurations |
Premiere
PPPoE provider. Has end to end solution including clients and servers. |
Best
overall support for dialup capability. |
Best
overall support for dialup capability. |
| Weak points |
Limited
dial-roaming support. Lack of multi-market capability. |
Lack
of muti-market capability. Lacks sessioning capabilities to support PPPoE and PPTP.
Administrative capabilities also lacking. |
Lack
of support for Apple, no administration tools, no dial-roaming support. |
Limited
dial-roaming support. Does not seem to have ways to collect demographic information. |
Lack
of support for Apple. Limited multi-market capability. |
Lack
of support for Apple. Limited multi-market capability. |
| Question marks? |
What
is this software's sessioning capabilities? |
How
many languages does this software support? How is this software remotely managed - if at
all? |
How
easily can these applications be configured or customized for each operator or reseller? |
How
well and to what extent does it support NON-PPPoE operating customers. How much emphasis
is this company placing on PPPoE and what other uses are their for their server software
besides supporting PPPoE? |
How
well are the broadband capabilities integrated into those of its dialup client (broadband
client appears weakest of two)? |
How
well are the broadband capabilities integrated into those of its dialup client (broadband
client appears weakest of two)? |
| General thoughts on company
direction |
Seems
to have pretty good success selling on its own as well through its partners. The
capability and flexibility of this tool provide for a wealth of options for 3rd parties. |
Seem
to be focused on broadband-cable and increasingly understanding DSL. The approach of
focusing on increasingly more markets addressing each market's needs and then moving on as
market share increases seems to be working - thus confirming that product reflects the
needs of market. |
Seem
to be approaching all markets - broadcast mode but with respect to their offering to any
particular market their product lacks focus. |
Seems
to be approaching all markets in a kind of broadcast marketing approach. However, unlike
Friendly, this approach seems centered around offering PPPoE solution that is offered in
an end-to-end variety. |
Perhaps
the market leader in sales wins but is the technology lager. Seems to be pushing vendor
specific capabilities to boost partnerships and distribution channels. |
Perhaps
the market leader in sales wins but is the technology lager. Seems to be pushing vendor
specific capabilities to boost partnerships and distribution channels. |
| Possible roadblocks that
lie ahead |
Lack
of multi-market capability could jeopardize partnerships if solution fails to deliver
working products in these areas. Administrative tools must evolve in concert with overall
capability of software. May be difficult to sustain this feature set over multiple
services and markets. |
The
lack of product completeness to address the needs of its focused customer base prevents
this product from securely winning its customers. As a result customer base will erode as
better technology competes. Many of its current customers have multiple deals with its
competitors. |
With
focus lacking, the product begs a best in class capability. QoS and wireless support could
be that differentiate. However, the wireless market is small and evolving and QoS has yet
to secure a strong hold of importance. Could be a while before these capabilities get
serious attention from potential customers. |
PPPoE
is in many ways superior to traditional cable-HSD services that offer general TCP/IP
connections. However this change requires something slightly different of an experience by
the customer. As a result this approach is best in greenfield installations but not so
easy to deploy over incumbent TCP/IP connection services. |
Lack
of management, development, and customization tools will limit the success of the
above strategy. May be struggling with the need to retool software to adopt more current
array of features offered by competitors - vendor customizations may just be a short term
strategy to boost sales channels during transition. |
Lack
of management, development, and customization tools will limit the success of the
above strategy. May be struggling with the need to retool software to adopt more current
array of features offered by competitors - vendor customizations may just be a short term
strategy to boost sales channels during transition. |
External factors that could reshuffle leadership among vendors in
this space:
| Technology |
Event |
Relative chance of occurring |
| PPPoE |
Widespread adoption of PPPoE would elevate those vendors that currently
support this capability to elite status. |
30% |
| |
|
|
General questions I have for this industry are:
What happens after the gold rush? Once a majority of people have signed
up for broadband what happens next? Service qualification vendors need to begin thinking
of their second life after the gold rush where a majority of their income will not come
from signing up broadband subscribers but from some other source. What will that source
be?
Readers who use this information for investment purposes do so
at their own risk! Opinions expressed are just that and not based on
insider information or information otherwise obtained illegally.
Can Birds-Eye.Net help you or your Company?
Receive your Birds-Eye.Net articles and white
papers hot off
the presses by adding our RSS feed to your reader.
|
|
(C) Copyright Birds-Eye.Net, All rights reserved.
It is against the law to reproduce this content or any portion of it in any form without the explicit written permission of Birds-Eye Network Services, LLC. Federal copyright law (17 USC 504) makes it illegal, punishable with fines up to $100,000 per violation plus attorney's fees.
|