|
|
|
|
Rising Competitive Threat of Communications as a Service (CaaS)
Where and how is CaaS competing against Telecom and Cable?
By: Bruce Bahlmann - Contributing Author (your
feedback
is important to us!)
Created: August 26, 2008
Communications as a Service (CaaS) as well as
everything (or “x”) as a service or XaaS involves migrating away from
traditional licensing and installs of technology to deliver software, IT,
Public Relations, Voice services, etc. as they are needed (on-demand) for a
fixed monthly cost whereby minimizing the disruption in a business. While
CaaS may have many names (e.g. Hosted Services, Unified Communications,
etc.), they all seem to resonate around installing some customer premise
equipment which facilitates fixed and mobile device access to the services
which are maintained out of one or more central/regional facilities by the
CaaS or Managed Service Provider (MSP).
After more than 20 years in this business some CaaS
companies are starting to see daylight. According to Gartner, CaaS will grow
from $251.9 million in 2007 to $2.3 billion in 2011 representing an annual
growth rate of more than 105% - with the largest growth expected to come
between 2010 and 2011. The sweet spot for this industry seems to be the
Small to Medium sized Business (SMB) market where CaaS vendors have been
successfully chipping away at mainstream telecom vendors (ILEC and cable) to
offer significant discounts (up to 50%) for bundled services. CaaS slow
start has been attributed to many factors but near the top of the list
involves customers needing time to get used to higher, but better
consolidated, pricing. As an industry, CaaS is seeing average pricing of
around $50/seat but some operators have been able to fetch $100/seat or more
based on expanding the range of services bundled and throwing in extras
(like a T1). Among the benefits of CaaS include:
- Low startup costs – No capital equipment to buy,
expensive technical help to hire (virtual CTO), maintenance fees, or
applications to setup and run – rather all services come as one packaged
monthly rate in a pay-as-you-go model.
- Virtual company – Ability to support a distributed
company through collaboration applications like unified messaging,
real-time presence, audio/video/web conferencing, etc. as well as have
the expertise to run a communications system that can reach employees
around the globe.
- Guaranteed Quality of Service (QoS) and quick turn
around – CaaS service quality generally sets the standard that internal
IT departments aspire to provide and all services have been pre-tested,
integrated, and preconfigured to work together, so adding a new service
doesn’t involve lengthy deployment cycles.
The range of services include: Internet service,
conferencing, email (outlook) integration, e-faxing, local phone service,
long distance calling, business applications, and instant messaging.
500 pound gorillas in this space include the usual
suspects. Microsoft is working on a “Service in the Sky” for unified
communications which does for CaaS what Comcast’s Headend in the Sky (HITS)
does for small to medium sized cable operators. Service in the Sky has the
potential to greatly expand the current service repertoire of competing CaaS
companies (a number of which are already aligned with Microsoft) as well as
establish a meaningful roadmap of continuous service additions and upgrades
– especially with the announcement of Microsoft stepping up its deployment
of new data centers. Cisco Systems recent acquisition of WebEx which already
offers WebOffice, a set of applications offered as a service, has been thus
far quiet about its CaaS plans. However, clearly it has assembled many of
the pieces it would need to do this. Google and especially Amazon have also
made strides in this area.
The trouble with competing with CaaS is the deep
pockets of their technology and application partners. Near term, as CaaS
companies become larger and more savvy they could move up market to small to
medium sized enterprises which could further expand their existing market.
However, their Achilles heel and what likely impacts their churn the most is
a personal touch as well as a strong presence to compete in local markets.
For now, they are just a mild annoyance in business telecom sales but this
is likely to change in the next 2 years.
Breakdown of players:
| Vendor: |
Market: |
Rev (2007) |
Rev (2006) |
News: |
|
8x8 |
EGHT |
$61 mil |
$31 mil |
|
|
Aptela |
private |
na |
$0.250 mil |
|
|
CallTower |
private |
na |
$7.4 mil |
Partnered with
Nevotek, Inc. – 11/10/2006
New Customer – Cybermax – 06/20/2006 |
|
Cbeyond |
CBEY |
$80 mil |
$76 mil |
|
|
Cypress Communications |
private |
$70 mil |
|
|
|
Intelepeer |
private |
$40 mil |
na |
|
|
M5 Networks |
private |
na |
$11 mil |
|
|
Smoothstone |
private |
|
|
New Customer –
Southern Star, Inc. – 07/07/2008
New Customer – Healthcare Waste Solutions – 10/16/2007
Partnered with Advanced Technology Consulting – 10/16/2007
New Customer - Travel Authority – 5/11/2007
New Customer - Jones Plastic & Engineering – 3/5/2007
Partnered with Network Solutions, Inc. – 9/26/2006
Acquired Easy411 – 8/7/2006
Partnered with Solarcom Partner Services – 2/28/2006 |
Can Birds-Eye.Net help you or your Company?
Receive your Birds-Eye.Net articles and white
papers hot off
the presses by adding our RSS feed to your reader.
|
|
(C) Copyright Birds-Eye.Net, All rights reserved.
It is against the law to reproduce this content or any portion of it in any form without the explicit written permission of Birds-Eye Network Services, LLC. Federal copyright law (17 USC 504) makes it illegal, punishable with fines up to $100,000 per violation plus attorney's fees.
|