|
Self Service Maintenance Tools
By: Bruce Bahlmann - Contributing Author (your
feedback
is important to us!)
Created: November 11, 1998
Note: For help designing/developing your self-service program or for developing tools to help you improve or implement such a program contact Birds-Eye.Net.
Overview:
An ever-present fact in the Internet business is that one must
continue to grow its subscriber base. However, to insure profitability, one must begin to
streamline customer activation and its technical support obligations by augmenting
personnel with technology wherever possible. Figure 1.0 represents a complex sequence of
events that each potential customer must experience. Today, Broadband operators must rely
on its internal employees to process each phase of the customer care process. If unaltered, this single fact will continue to
limit our ability to scale the business.

Figure 1.0 Customer Care
Process
The objective of this document is to re-examine the current direction
one broadband operator is taking to provide subscriber maintenance tools and propose a new
direction (based on the recent completion of a proof of concept). This successful proof of
concept (Self Service Interface) is compared in the table below to the existing products
(some of which are already deployed) to recommend the best long term strategy for MediaOne
to continue to add self service functionality for its customers.
For more information about the
proof of concept refer to the document: Self Service Maintenance Proof Project
Tool: |
Description: |
Status: |
Time to Market: |
Password Change UI |
Stand-alone web application that allows customers to change their email
properties such as email password, forwarding address, etc. |
Deployed |
1 year + |
Multi-User Tool |
Stand-alone web application that allows customers to add email accounts
to their existing account and set various parameters with their email, personnel web
hosting service (amount of space, etc). |
Development |
2 years |
Self-Maintenance Interface |
Centralized account maintenance tool that utilizes functionality of
customer care system and a Java plug-in to enable customers from every region to maintain
selected aspects of their broadband account. |
Proof of concept complete |
2 months |
Keys to Providing Useful
Self Service Tools:
To better understand the breakdown in customer care calls, one
broadband operator's regions were recently surveyed (November 1998) to determine what
portion of the calls were related to maintenance of email and mac addresses.
Regions |
Atlanta |
Chicago |
New England |
Minnesota |
Midwest |
Southeast |
West |
Number of customers |
|
6,503 |
30,149 |
2,250 |
|
16,585 |
5,808 |
Total number of trouble tickets |
900 |
1,221 |
6,673 |
372 |
|
18,145 |
1,632 |
Email Maintenance related |
50 |
72 |
286 |
11 |
|
837 |
253 |
MAC address related |
NA* |
NA |
108 |
NA |
|
NA |
21 |
*Note that some regions do not register cable modem/pc MAC
addresses so these only apply to LANCity two-way regions.
The addition of self service maintenance tools could save a good
portion of the 1,509+ calls that Tier 2 received regarding email maintenance and 129+
calls received on MAC addresses each week.
The relative costs associated with customers having to call in
to have a customer care person perform this maintenance for them is shown in the table
below. The following costs are associated typical numbers that one broadband operator
was/is experiencing:
Call cost $1.10 per min or $13.20
per call
Maintenance Item |
Weekly Cost |
Monthly Cost |
Yearly Cost |
Email Maintenance |
$19,918.80 |
$79,675.20 |
$1,035,777.60 |
NIC Maintenance |
$1,702.80 |
$6,811.20 |
$88,545.60 |
Taking these numbers into
next year would show an increase of both of these figures across the board. Currently the
number of calls taken on email and mac address maintenance represents 2.5% of the total
number subscribers. If we double or triple our total number of subscribers these numbers
could potentially double or more.
A closer examination of the products mentioned above are
compared in the following table. In this table certain features of these products are
evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is easy (considerably less difficult) and 5 is hard
(considerably more difficult).
Comparison of Existing
Products and Self Service Interface:
Features: |
Password
Change UI |
Multi-User Tool |
Self
Service Interface |
Web based Interface |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Secure (information encrypted) |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Firewall Issues |
N-completely outside |
N-completely outside |
N |
Host |
Regional web server |
Regional web server |
Separate Application Server |
Expandable |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Rapidly deployable |
N |
N |
Y |
Easily developed |
N |
N |
N/Y |
Customer Care accessible logging |
N |
N |
Y |
Platform supported |
Solaris* |
Solaris* |
NT/Solaris** |
Language |
C++ |
C++ |
Java |
Ease of deployment (1[easy]-5[hard]) |
4 |
5 |
2*** |
Maintainability (1[easy]-5[hard]) |
3 |
5 |
2 |
Ease of supporting convergent services (video/hsd/tele)
(1[easy]-5[hard]) |
5 |
5 |
2 |
Ease of housing multiple tools under one roof (1[easy]-5[hard]) |
5 |
5 |
1 |
Cost of development/deployment |
High |
High |
Low |
Group in charge of development |
Engineering |
Engineering |
IT |
Availability of development staff |
Low |
Low |
High |
* C++ code must be ported to NT platform, but this is doable.
** Solaris version in the works or already available.
*** Development would have the added benefit of giving Tier 1 access to
this functionality
Can Birds-Eye.Net help you or your Company?
Receive your Birds-Eye.Net articles and white
papers hot off
the presses by adding our RSS feed to your reader.
|